Routine Kidney Graft Ultrasound After Elective Ureteric Stent Removal: Does it Help?

Transplantation (KTx) is considered to be the best renal replacement therapy, and improving its outcomes remains a primary challenge. KTx ureteral stenting has been used to prevent urological complications, but there is no consensus on the timing of stent removal, and literature regarding routine ultrasonography after ureteric stent removal (RUSUS) to detect complications is lacking. Point-of-care ultrasound has been gaining drive in the medical community in recent years, including nephrologists. We aimed to define the incidence of urological complications diagnosed with RUSUS, if those findings changed patient's management and ultrasound utility. Contrary to previously published data, in our cohort RUSUS allowed a timely diagnosis and early treatment of urological complications, a key factor for successful transplantation. KTx point-of-care ultrasound is a cost-effective and reproducible test that provides relevant information to guide clinical decisions, seeming most efficient when performed approximately 2 weeks post ureteral stent removal. Interventional nephrologists can promptly perform these examinations, reducing waiting times and improving graft and patient's survival.

Reversed diastolic intrarenal flow in page kidney following renal biopsy.

Page's kidney is a condition that occurs due to external renal compression, usually caused by a subcapsular haematoma, generating a renal compartmental syndrome with parenchymal damage and renal perfusion alteration. Classically associated with renal trauma, Page's kidney can also arise after invasive renal procedures, such as renal biopsies or percutaneous nephrostomies. Clinically, it can trigger hypertension due to activation of the renin-angiotensin system induced by hypoperfusion secondary to renal parenchymal compression and can also present with varying degrees of renal function impairment. Furthermore, severe acute renal failure may be found particularly in patients with solitary kidneys or renal transplants. We present two cases of Page's kidney after renal biopsy and their PoCUS ultrasound findings. We would like to highlight the reversed diastolic flow on Doppler ultrasound in this entity, a pattern we have found in all two cases.

Trial design of the MOTheR HDx study: a multicenter, open-label, prospective, randomized study to explore the morbidity and mortality in patients dialyzed with the Theranova HDx in comparison with online hemodiafiltration.

Background: Dialysis patients have been maintaining a high rate of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. For this reason, it is to introduce necessary new technical advances in clinical practice. There is a relation between toxins retention and inflammation, mortality and morbidity. Medium cut-off (MCO) membranes are a new generation of membranes that allow the removal of a greater number of medium-sized molecules compared with high-flux hemodialysis (HF-HD), but retaining albumin. MCO membranes have an increased permeability and the presence of internal filtration. Because of these special properties, MCO generated a new concept of therapy called expanded HD (HDx). Until now, online hemodiafiltration (OL-HDF) has demonstrated its superiority, in terms of survival, compared with HF-HD. However, the comparison between OL-HDF and HDx remains an unsolved question. Methods: The MOTheR HDx study trial (NCT03714386) is an open-label, multicenter, prospective, 1:1 randomized, parallel-group trial designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of HDx compared with OL-HDF in patients treated for dialysis in Spain for up to 36 months. The main endpoint is to determinate whether HDx is non inferior to OL-HDF at reducing the combined outcome of all-cause death and stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic), acute coronary syndrome (angina and myocardial infarction), peripheral arterial disease (amputation or revascularization) and ischemic colitis (mesenteric thrombosis). Results: The trial has already started.

Individually adjusted absolute blood volume feedback control: A promising solution for intradialytic hypotension.

INTRODUCTION: Intradialytic hypotension (IDH) remains one of the most frequent complications associated to hemodialysis (HD), frequently triggered by a reduction in absolute blood volume (ABV) not compensated by vascular refilling. A recently developed dilutional method allows routinary measurement of ABV and, by a simple algorithm, may turn blood volume monitor (BVM) guided UF (ultrafiltration) biofeedback into an ABV control, automatically adjusting UF rate to maintain ABV above a preset threshold. The aim of this study is to identify an individual critical ABV threshold and test the ability of an ABV feedback control to avoid IDH. METHODS: We studied 24 patients throughout three consecutive midweek HD treatments. ABV and blood pressure (BP) were measured every 30 min and anytime the patient referred any symptoms to identify each patient's critical ABV (ABV at the time of hypotension). A fixed bolus dilution approach at the start of HD was used to calculate ABV. Then, patients were followed through three additional HD treatments and IDH development was analyzed. FINDINGS: Seventy-one treatments performed in 24 patients. ABV monitoring showed a constant decrease as HD treatment progressed. Thirteen IDH events were observed in eight different patients, with a mean systolic BP drop in IDH treatments of 37.38 ± 4.31 mmHg and a mean adjusted ABV at hypotension of 71.07 ± 14.88 mL/kg. Critical ABV was individually set in patients prone to IDH. As expected, ABV feedback control successfully maintained ABV over preset critical ABV. IDH events were avoided in 21 out of 22 treatments performed. ABV drop was successfully reduced, as well as SBP drop (despite similar UF than prior to ABV feedback control implementation). DISCUSSION: ABV feedback control avoided IDH in 21 out of 22 treatments performed by maintaining blood volume above critical ABV, significantly reducing ABV variations without compromising prescribed UF.

Lipid profile of patients treated with evolocumab in Spanish hospital nephrology units (RETOSS NEFRO).

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To describe the clinical characteristics, the reasons for initiating therapy and the effects of treatment in the initial phase of evolocumab availability in the Nephrology Units of Spain. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective, observational and multicentric study that included patients initiating treatment with evolocumab (from February 2016 to August 2018), in 15 Nephrology Units in Spain. The demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients, the lipid lowering treatment and the evolution of the lipid profiles between 24 weeks pre-initiation and 12±4 weeks post-initiation of evolocumab were reviewed. RESULTS: 60 patients were enrolled: 53.3% women; mean (SD) age, 56.9 (12.8) years, 45.0% with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) (5.0% homozygous and 40.0% heterozygous) and 65.0% with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. The mean (SD) eGFR was 62.6 (30.0) ml/min/1.73m2 (51.7% of patients had eGFR <60ml/min/1.73m2 [CKD stage>2]), 50.0% had proteinuria (>300mg/g) and 10.0% had nephrotic syndrome. Other CV risk factors were hypertension (75.0%), diabetes (25.0%), and smoking (21.7%). A 40.0% of patients were statin intolerant. At evolocumab initiation, 41.7% of patients were on a high intensity statin, 18.3% on moderate intensity statin and 50.0% were receiving ezetimibe. Mean (SD) LDL-c at evolocumab initiation was 179.7 (62.9) mg/dL (53.4% of patients with LDL-c ≥160mg/dL and 29.3% ≥190mg/dL). After 12 weeks, evolocumab resulted in LDL-c reductions of 60.1%. At week 12, 90.0% of patients reached LDL-c levels <100mg/dL, 70.0% <70mg/dL, and 55.0% <55mg/dL, while mean eGFR levels and statin use remained stable. CONCLUSION: In Nephrology Units of Spain, evolocumab was predominantly prescribed in patients with FH, chronic renal disease (CRD>2) and secondary prevention, with LDL-c levels above those recommended by the guidelines. Evolocumab used in clinical practice significantly reduced the LDL-c levels in all patients included in the study.

Assisted peritoneal dialysis (asPD): age is not the key.

BACKGROUND: Peritoneal dialysis (PD) has multiple advantages over other dialysis modalities. As a home-based therapy, it allows patients to keep their autonomy, avoid frequent hospital visits and carry on with their usual lifestyle. However, as a self-care therapy, dependency has been traditionally considered a contraindication. However, assistance to perform PD (asPD) can be provided regardless of the patient's age and the duration of such help. This paper is aimed at reporting on assisted PD use in a Spanish Center, and is the first report on asPD from this country. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the electronic medical records of all patients consecutively treated with PD between May 1997 and December 2020 in our PD Unit. Assisted PD was defined as PD treatment requiring the help of another person. On the basis of the duration of dependency, we divided our cohort into: Group 1: Patients totally dependent at the start of PD treatment; Group 2: self-care patients that developed total dependency during follow up; Group 3: patients who needed short-term PD assistance. Group 4, consisting of 175 self-care PD, served as the control group. RESULTS: Seventy-three percent of patients who required asPD did so during their follow up, showing that an important proportion of patients may require some help even if they were autonomous at the beginning of PD. Even for short time periods, asPD should be an option, as up to 44% of autonomous PD patients became dependent for different reasons over time. Spouses were the most frequent caregivers and absence or loss of caregiver was a main reason for switching to hemodialysis. Fourteen percent of the patients received asPD as palliative care, with clinical symptoms and perceived well-being as the main treatment goals, with adequate results. The need for support and the quality of life were periodically discussed by patients, family members and hospital staff. CONCLUSION: Assisted PD is a safe option for dependent patients, young or elderly, and may result less expensive for our healthcare system, even when caregivers receive a financial incentive.

Spontaneous peritoneal dialysis catheter expulsion: A case series.

There are a significant number of mechanical complications related the peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheter and early diagnosis is key. Between them, the spontaneous extrusion of the catheter is quite uncommon but it should be included among the possible complications of the technique, given that it can be related to frequent situations in PD patients like abdominal wall issues, past immunosuppression or PD fluid leakage. In 25 years our Unit had three cases, probably related to peritoneal fluid leakage, exit site infection and past steroid treatment. Careful examination of abdominal wall preimplantation, adequate break-in period to allow maturation and early detection of exit site infection to start treatment in a timely fashion could help to prevent this rare complication. The complete extrusion of the catheter does not preclude from continuing PD treatment.

Live donor kidney transplantation. Situation analysis and roadmap.

Living donor kidney transplantation (LDKT) is the best treatment option for end stage renal disease in terms of both patient and graft survival. However, figures on LDKT in Spain that had been continuously growing from 2005 to 2014, have experienced a continuous decrease in the last five years. One possible explanation for this decrease is that the significant increase in the number of deceased donors in Spain during the last years, both brain death and controlled circulatory death donors, might have generated the false idea that we have coped with the transplant needs. Moreover, a greater number of deceased donor kidney transplants have caused a heavy workload for the transplant teams. Furthermore, the transplant teams could have moved on to a more conservative approach to the information and assessment of patients and families considering the potential long-term risks for donors in recent papers. However, there is a significant variability in the LDKT rate among transplant centers and regions in Spain independent of their deceased donor rates. This fact and the fact that LDKT is usually a preemptive option for patients with advanced chronic renal failure, as time on dialysis is a negative independent factor for transplant outcomes, lead us to conclude that the decrease in LDKT depends on other factors. Thus, in the kidney transplant annual meeting held at ONT site in 2018, a working group was created to identify other causes for the decrease of LDKT in Spain and its relationship with the different steps of the process. The group was formed by transplant teams, a representative of the transplant group of the Spanish Society of Nephrology (SENTRA), a representative of the Spanish Society of Transplants (SET) and representatives of the Spanish National Transplant Organization (ONT). A self-evaluation survey that contains requests about the phases of the LDKT processes (information, donor work out, informed consent, surgeries, follow-up and human resources) were developed and sent to 33 LDKT teams. All the centers answered the questionnaire. The analysis of the answers has resulted in the creation of a national analysis of strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, threats (SWOT) of the LDKT program in Spain and the development of recommendations targeted to improve every step of the donation process. The work performed, the conclusions and recommendations provided, have been reflected in the following report: Spanish living donor kidney transplant program assessment: recommendations for optimization. This document has also been reviewed by a panel of experts, representatives of the scientific societies (Spanish Society of Urology (AEU), Spanish Society of Nephrology Nursery (SEDEN), Spanish Society of Immunology (SEI/GETH)) and the patient association ALCER. Finally, the report has been submitted to public consultation, reaching ample consensus. In addition, the transplant competent authorities of the different regions in Spainhave adopted the report at institutional level. The work done and the recommendations to optimize LDKT are summarized in the present manuscript, organized by the different phases of the donation process.

Kidney Autotransplantation and Orthotopic Kidney Transplantation: Two Different Approaches for Complex Cases.

Introduction: Transplantation surgery teams often have to face complex cases. In certain circumstances, such as occlusion of the iliac vessels or prior pelvic surgery, heterotopic kidney transplantation may not be feasible and orthotopic kidney transplantation (OKT) could be a good alternative. Kidney autotransplantation (KAT) has been described as a potential treatment for complex renovascular, ureteral, or neoplastic conditions. There are scarce data regarding the complications and outcomes of these procedures; therefore, we present our experience. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analysed the medical records of both 21 patients who had received OKT and 19 patients who underwent KAT between 1993 and 2020. We collected demographic features and data regarding surgical technique, complications, and graft outcomes. Kidney graft survival was calculated using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Results: Regarding OKT, in 15 (71.43%) cases, it was the first kidney transplantation. The most common indication was the unsuitable iliac region due to vascular abnormalities (57.14%). The early postoperative complication rate was high (66.67%), with 23.81% of Clavien grade 3b complications. During the follow-up period (mean 5.76 -SD 6.15- years), we detected 9 (42.85%) graft losses. At 1 year, the survival rate was 84.9%. Concerning KAT, the most frequent indication was ureteral pathology (52.63%), followed by vascular lesions (42.11%). The overall early complication rate was 42.11%. During the follow-up period (mean of 4.47 years), 4 (15.79%) graft losses were reported. Conclusions: Although OKT and KAT have high complication rates, these techniques can be considered as two valuable approaches for complex cases, in the absence of other therapeutic options.

Impact of different COVID-19 waves on kidney replacement therapy epidemiology and mortality: REMER 2020.

BACKGROUND: Kidney replacement therapy (KRT) confers the highest risk of death from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, most data refer to the early pandemic waves. Whole-year analysis compared with prior secular trends are scarce. METHODS: We present the 2020 REMER Madrid KRT registry, corresponding to the Spanish Region hardest hit by COVID-19. RESULTS: In 2020, KRT incidence decreased 12% versus 2019, while KRT prevalence decreased by 1.75% for the first time since records began and the number of kidney transplants (KTs) decreased by 16%. Mortality on KRT was 10.2% (34% higher than the mean for 2008-2019). The 2019-2020 increase in mortality was larger for KTs (+68%) than for haemodialysis (+24%) or peritoneal dialysis (+38%). The most common cause of death was infection [n = 419 (48% of deaths)], followed by cardiovascular [n = 200 (23%)]. Deaths from infection increased by 167% year over year and accounted for 95% of excess deaths in 2020 over 2019. COVID-19 was the most common cause of death (68% of infection deaths, 33% of total deaths). The bulk of COVID-19 deaths [209/285 (73%)] occurred during the first COVID-19 wave, which roughly accounted for the increased mortality in 2020. Being a KT recipient was an independent risk factor for COVID-19 death. CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 negatively impacted the incidence and prevalence of KRT, but the increase in KRT deaths was localized to the first wave of the pandemic. The increased annual mortality argues against COVID-19 accelerating the death of patients with short life expectancy and the temporal pattern of COVID-19 mortality suggests that appropriate healthcare may improve outcomes.

Impact of dialysate sodium concentration on vascular refilling.

BACKGROUND: Although relationship between dialysate sodium concentration and hemodynamic stability has been well studied over the years, outcomes of absolute blood volume (ABV) maintenance and vascular refilling volume (Vref ) modifications were not included, as its analysis has not been easily accessible to direct investigation. However, recent studies report a simple and feasible methodology to assess ABV and Vref during hemodialysis (HD) treatments. It is the aim of this study to analyze whether sodium concentration in dialysate modifies ABV drop and Vref . METHODS: The study was performed in 19 patients under HD. During three different sessions, sodium concentration in dialysate was randomized to three different profiles: low sodium concentration (LNa, 138 mEq/L), neutral sodium concentration (NNa, 140 mEq/L), and high sodium concentration (HNa, 143 mEq/L). ABV and Vref were calculated using Kron et al methodology. RESULTS: Predialysis values of the measured parameters showed similar results for the three profiles. Sodium concentration showed an effect on ABV drop, Vref, and vascular refilling fraction (Fref ). Pair-wise comparison revealed mean ABV decreased 0.21 L less when using HNa profile versus LNa profile (p = 0.027), a mean Vref increase of 0.39 L (p = 0.038), and a mean Fref increase of 9.94% (p = 0.048). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that the use of HNa profiles increases Vref and Fref and reduces ABV drop during dialysis treatments when compared to LNa profiles.

Incoercible Vomiting in a Polycystic (ADPKD) Patient on Peritoneal Dialysis.

Although gastrointestinal symptoms are not uncommon in PD patients due to several causes, such as infusion volume with early satiety, constipation, or peritonitis, sometimes the differential diagnosis is more challenging for nephrologists. We present the case of a woman with end-stage renal disease due to autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease on PD who presented with swollen legs and incoercible vomiting. After ruling out constipation and infection, an abdominal CT was done, revealing extrinsic compression of the intrahepatic inferior cava vein (ICV) and massive venous thrombosis from ICV to bilateral iliofemoral deep veins. In addition, CT also showed displacement and extrinsic compression of the stomach, pylorus, and duodenum due to an enlarged liver cyst. Percutaneous drainage and sclerosis of the cyst compressing the stomach was performed, anticoagulation was started, and the patient clinically improved with complete resolution of symptoms.

Effect of Beta-Blocker Cardioselectivity on Vascular Refilling in Hemodialysis Patients.

BACKGROUND: ß-Blockers are the most frequently prescribed cardioprotective drugs in hemodialysis (HD) patients, despite their weak evidence. We sought to evaluate the effects of ß-blockers on vascular refilling during HD treatments and examine whether carvedilol, for being noncardioselective and poorly dialyzable, associates more impact than others. METHODS: The study was performed in a cohort of maintenance HD patients from a tertiary center. All patients had previous ß-blocker prescription. We conducted a prospective crossover study and measured vascular refilling volume (Vref) and vascular refilling fraction (Fref) in 2 circumstances: under ß-blocker treatment (ßb profile) and without ß-blocker effect (non-ßb profile). RESULTS: Twenty patients were included, 10 of whom were treated with carvedilol. Predialysis values were comparable between the 2 profiles. Although the ßb profile showed lower Vref and higher ABV drop, these differences did not reach statistical significance. Data showed an increase in Fref in the non-ßb profile (70.01 ± 6.80% vs. 63.14 ± 11.65%; p = 0.015). The ßb profile associated a significantly higher risk of intradialytic hypotension (IDH) (risk ratio 2.40; 95% CI: 1.04-5.55). When analyzing separately the carvedilol group, patients dialyzed under drug effect experienced a significant impairment in Vref, Fref, and refilling rate. CONCLUSIONS: Administering ß-blockers before HD associated a higher risk of IDH and a decrease in Fref. Patients dialyzed under carvedilol effect showed an impaired refilling, probably related to its noncardioselectivity and lower dializability.

Safety of renal biopsy bleeding prophylaxis with desmopressin.

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous renal biopsy (PRB) is invasive, and bleeding-related complications are a concern. Desmopressin (DDAVP) is a selective type 2 vasopressin receptor-agonist also used for haemostasis. AIM: To evaluate the side effects of intravenous (IV) weight-adjusted desmopressin preceding PRB. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of renal biopsies performed by nephrologists from 2013 to 2017 in patients who received single-dose DDAVP pre-PRB. RESULTS: Of 482 PRBs, 65 (13.5%) received DDAVP (0.3 µg/kg); 55.4% of the PRBs were native kidneys. Desmopressin indications were altered platelet function analyser (PFA)-100 results (75.3% of the patients), urea >24.9 mmol/L (15.5%), antiplatelet drugs (6.1%) and thrombocytopaenia (3%). Of the 65 patients, 30.7% had minor asymptomatic complications, and 3 patients had major complications. Pre-PRB haemoglobin (Hb) <100 g/L was a risk factor for Hb decrease >10 g/L, and altered collagen-epinephrine (Col-Epi) time was a significant risk factor for overall complications. Mean sodium decrease was 0.6 ± 3 mmol/L. Hyponatraemia without neurological symptoms was diagnosed in two patients; no cardiovascular events occurred. CONCLUSION: Hyponatraemia after single-dose DDAVP is rare. A single IV dose of desmopressin adjusted to the patient's weight is safe as pre-PRB bleeding prophylaxis.

Lipid profile of patients treated with evolocumab in Spanish hospital nephrology units (RETOSS NEFRO). / Perfil clínico de los pacientes tratados con evolocumab en unidades hospitalarias de nefrología en España (RETOSS-NEFRO).

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To describe the clinical characteristics, the reasons for initiating therapy and the effects of treatment in the initial phase of evolocumab availability in the Nephrology Units of Spain. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective, observational and multicentric study that included patients initiating treatment with evolocumab (from February 2016 to August 2018), in 15 Nephrology Units in Spain. The demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients, the lipid lowering treatment and the evolution of the lipid profiles between 24 weeks pre-initiation and 12±4 weeks post-initiation of evolocumab were reviewed. RESULTS: Sixty patients were enrolled: 53.3% women; mean (SD) age, 56.9 (12.8) years, 45.0% with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) (5.0% homozygous and 40.0% heterozygous) and 65.0% with atherosclerotic cardiovascular (CV) disease. The mean (SD) eGFR was 62.6 (30.0)ml/min/1.73m2 (51.7% of patients had eGFR<60ml/min/1.73m2 [CKD stage>2]), 50.0% had proteinuria (>300mg/g) and 10.0% had nephrotic syndrome. Other CV risk factors were hypertension (75.0%), diabetes (25.0%), and smoking (21.7%). A 40.0% of patients were statin intolerant. At evolocumab initiation, 41.7% of patients were on a high-intensity statin, 18.3% on moderate intensity statin and 50.0% were receiving ezetimibe. Mean (SD) LDL-c at evolocumab initiation was 179.7 (62.9)mg/dL (53.4% of patients with LDL-c≥160mg/dL and 29.3%≥190mg/dL). After 12 weeks, evolocumab resulted in LDL-c reductions of 60.1%. At week 12, 90.0% of patients reached LDL-c levels <100mg/dL, 70.0% <70mg/dL, and 55.0% <55mg/dL, while mean eGFR levels and statin use were remained stable. CONCLUSION: In Nephrology Units of Spain, evolocumab was predominantly prescribed in patients with FH, chronic renal disease (CRD>2) and secondary prevention, with LDL-c levels above those recommended by the guidelines. Evolocumab used in clinical practice significantly reduced the LDL-c levels in all patients included in the study.

Live donor kidney transplantation. Situation analysis and roadmap. / Trasplante renal de donante vivo. Análisis de situación y hoja de ruta.

Living donor kidney transplantation (LDKT) is the best treatment option for end stage renal disease in terms of both patient and graft survival. However, figures on LDKT in Spain that had been continuously growing from 2005 to 2014, have experienced a continuous decrease in the last five years. One possible explanation for this decrease is that the significant increase in the number of deceased donors in Spain during the last years, both brain death and controlled circulatory death donors, might have generated the false idea that we have coped with the transplant needs. Moreover, a greater number of deceased donor kidney transplants have caused a heavy workload for the transplant teams. Furthermore, the transplant teams could have moved on to a more conservative approach to the information and assessment of patients and families considering the potential long-term risks for donors in recent papers. However, there is a significant variability in the LDKT rate among transplant centers and regions in Spain independent of their deceased donor rates. This fact and the fact that LDKT is usually a preemptive option for patients with advanced chronic renal failure, as time on dialysis is a negative independent factor for transplant outcomes, lead us to conclude that the decrease in LDKT depends on other factors. Thus, in the kidney transplant annual meeting held at ONT site in 2018, a working group was created to identify other causes for the decrease of LDKT in Spain and its relationship with the different steps of the process. The group was formed by transplant teams, a representative of the transplant group of the Spanish Society of Nephrology (SENTRA), a representative of the Spanish Society of Transplants (SET) and representatives of the Spanish National Transplant Organization (ONT). A self-evaluation survey that contains requests about the phases of the LDKT processes (information, donor work out, informed consent, surgeries, follow-up and human resources) were developed and sent to 33 LDKT teams. All the centers answered the questionnaire. The analysis of the answers has resulted in the creation of a national analysis of strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, threats (SWOT) of the LDKT program in Spain and the development of recommendations targeted to improve every step of the donation process. The work performed, the conclusions and recommendations provided, have been reflected in the following report: Spanish living donor kidney transplant program assessment: recommendations for optimization. This document has also been reviewed by a panel of experts, representatives of the scientific societies (Spanish Society of Urology (AEU), Spanish Society of Nephrology Nursery (SEDEN), Spanish Society of Immunology (SEI/GETH)) and the patient association ALCER. Finally, the report has been submitted to public consultation, reaching ample consensus. In addition, the transplant competent authorities of the different regions in Spain have adopted the report at institutional level. The work done and the recommendations to optimize LDKT are summarized in the present manuscript, organized by the different phases of the donation process.

Absolute blood volume variations and vascular refilling in hemodialysis patients.

The imbalance between ultrafiltration volume (UF) and vascular refilling is considered a major cause for intradialytic hypotension. Recent studies report a noninvasive method to estimate vascular refilling (VREF ) by determining absolute blood volume (ABV). It was the aim of the study to analyze variations in ABV in a group of hemodialysis (HD) patients and examine VREF . Thirty one stable chronic HD patients were studied, aged 71.07 ± 13.31 years. Dialysis duration and UF requirements were based on physician prescription. VREF was calculated as: VREF  = VUF  - ΔV where ΔV is ABV variation during dialysis treatment. ABV at the beginning of the dialysis was 6.00 ± 2.39 L (92.82 ± 33.17 ml/kg) and at the end 5.38 ± 2.32 L (82.07 ± 31.41 ml/kg). Prescribed UF was 2.64 ± 0.83 L. Mean VREF was 2.05 ± 0.80 L, with a refilling fraction of 75.75 ± 12.79%. VREF was strongly correlated with UF volume (r2 0.877), and with pre-dialysis volume overload (r2 0.617). Patients under beta-blocker treatment showed significantly lower FREF . ABV measurement is an easy and noninvasive method that allows us to study VREF during HD. We found a strong correlation between VREF and UF.